Religious and Atheist Societies Are Destructive

Over the past few decades, the Western world has been changing. Whereas religion used to be universal, slowly but steady, it has begun losing ground and, especially in north-western Europe, but also in North America and the rest of Europe, atheism or merely a belief in God without an attached religion has become more and more common. As always, not everyone is equally happy with that, and many conservatives see this as a very bad sign for society. But which is better? A religious society, or a non-religious one?

Although extremists on both sides might disagree, both have their imperfections. Religious societies have shown their issues for thousands of years, and even though non-religious ones are still only local and fairly recent, even those have already shown that they aren’t as perfect as they are supposed to be.

But first, let’s start with the issues of a religious society, which can basically be summarised in just one word: morals, and particularly, wrong or extreme morals. If you look at the major monotheistic religions, Judaism, Christianity and Islam, you will find that each of them imposes very strict morals onto its believers. Of course, morals are good and they are important, but there is a certain limit to it.

In the case of these religions, that limit was reached. Women were/are forced to work in the household rather than to get a job, gays were/are being prosecuted, many wars have been fought over religion and, perhaps worst of all, those issues are accompanied by an extreme amount of ignorance. After all, as is particularly clear from some parts of the US or certain minority religious groups in Europe, religion can cause closed-mindedness, making progress virtually impossible.

Of course, on the other hand, religion has brought many good things. It has brought us positive morals, it has made people do good things and it has given people hope. Religion is extremely inspiring and the good things that have come from it should not be forgotten, even in a society that is becoming less and less religious.

Still, those issues are real, and it isn’t surprising that, particularly in the West, people have started looking for an alternative: a society in which religion doesn’t play a role. The idea is that it will be a society of tied individuals, in which everyone gets an equal chance to contribute their personal thoughts and in which freedom for the individual is a given. It is a society in which everyone can basically do whatever they want, without being judged, and the idea of it is beautiful.

However, as with all those other Utopia’s before, it’s not something that will happen. Ultimate freedom, if it’s even attainable at all, comes with repercussions, because as wonderful as human beings are, they simply aren’t perfect.

Non-religious societies no longer have the issue of too many morals, but instead, it now lacks morals. Alcohol and drug abuse have increased rapidly, violence and vandalism have never been this common and teenage mothers are forced to drop out of school every day. And despite all that, despite even the fact that freedom for everyone actually seems possible, there is still that extreme ignorance, because as it turned out, individualism hasn’t made us more aware of other people’s views and feelings. It has only made us more aware of ourselves.

Does that mean that a non-religious society is terrible and that the apocalypse is coming? Probably not. Still, it’s something to think about. Right now these non-religious societies only exist on small scale, so perhaps things will change eventually. In the end, it’s up to the individual to decide which society is less destructive. Basically, there are two options: either we choose a society in which people’s lives are ruined by others, or we choose one in which everyone has the freedom to ruin their own. It’s up to us to decide which one we prefer.


Don’t forget to rate/share/like this post, and if you have any thoughts of your own, please do leave them in the comments! And if you’re new here? Feel free to like the Facebook page for regular updates, or try having a look at the list of most popular posts!

More on this topic from Dean Richards:

Atheists Are Just as Ignorant as Those They Find Ignorant

How Science Proves That We Actually Don’t Exist

It Is Irrelevant That Atheists Are Smarter Than Religious People


About Dean Richards

A young student with a passion for writing. Aspiring author and human rights activist, but I write about anything. "If you don't like how things are, change it! You're not a tree!" New blog post every Monday!
This entry was posted in Controversial, Open-minded and tagged , , , , , , , , . Bookmark the permalink.

4 Responses to Religious and Atheist Societies Are Destructive

  1. Craen says:

    I think that you should look at the sociobiology point of view. I recommended you Wilson’s book – Sociobiology. There are very interesting theories.
    The Czech Republic are nearly idealy non-religious society. I live near this country. They don’t have many church or other temples. They don’t need religion. And they are really cheerful nation. In my country churches are everywhere. EVERYWHERE. It is a fixed point in space. Sometimes when I am lost in new city I look for the cathedral tower and I know that there will be center of town. And my nation isn’t so happy. You are born to be good catholic. Or you are in really big troubles.
    I like troubles. But sometimes I’m tired.
    I don’t belive in atheistic society. Faith is in our genes. But I wish religions were more peaceful than hateful.

    PS. Sorry for my language. English is my nightmare 🙂

  2. Hmm, that sounds interesting… Can you explain what exactly the socio-biological view is in this case? Does it argue that religion is something natural, or…?

    And yes, I definitely agree that religion should be more peaceful 😉

  3. Craen says:

    Oh… I really want know english better in this moment. It’ll be dificult…
    Sociobiology says that religion is natural. On the begining of humankind people needed something powerful, mystery and omniscient. We were frightened by all: big animals, storms, sea… But we needed somebody who can talk to god. So, the first priest, who must be keep happy and healthy, because god like him or whatever, and nobody want be struck by lightening…
    The most important is that religion has given us a sense of community. Family is important, but small, and people needed conquer new lands, defeat enemies etc. Common god is very strong binder. We saw it in Middle Ages. People need something what make them community, everybody are afraid of being alone. And if somebody is really good orator and socio-economic situation is really bad… BUM! We have prophet. Or Hitler.
    But scientists found genes of faith. We are predisposed to believe. My teacher has autism and Asperger syndrome. He said that he doesn’t have these genes, so for him faith is impossible. I know many atheists, biologists are in second place in terms of lack of faith. But sometimes I think that they are very strong believers. They believe in science.
    I’m really bad in explain thing in foreign language. I recommend to you this book. Especially since I’m not objective, I’m a biologist, but also a humanist (a family tradition).

  4. Well, that’s definitely a very interesting theory! Unfortunately I’ve only had one subject on sociobiology so far in my uni programme, and I have to admit: I did not like it.

    I will look up some info on it, though, and perhaps after I’ve finished my studies I might have a look at that book! Thanks!

Thoughts, criticism, questions or whatever else, they're always welcome! You can leave them down here, and none (as long as they're civil) will be deleted or denied.

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in: Logo

You are commenting using your account. Log Out /  Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )


Connecting to %s