It Is Irrelevant That Atheists Are Smarter Than Religious People

Ever since the Huffington Post revealed a study that shows atheists are more intelligent than theists, many atheists have been padding themselves on the back. The idea that this somehow justifies their claims and makes them in the right seems to be a popular way to interpret these results, but as appealing as that conclusion might be, perhaps it’s a bit premature.

In the past month I have made numerous posts criticising atheism. I don’t do that because I think atheism is wrong or because I feel like religion is right, but I do that because, as always, whenever something becomes the dominant way of thinking, it becomes ignorant. Just like certain parts of feminism, some atheists have become precisely that which they have always fought against: closed-minded.

The problem here is that the results of the study aren’t being thought about in a rational manner. They are simply accepted as a form of proof, because after all, if atheists are more intelligent, it must mean that anyone who can think rationally would come to the conclusion that God doesn’t exist. From a social-psychological perspective, however, that is absolute rubbish and way too simplistic.

The truth is that highly intelligent people act different from less intelligent people. They are more likely to be critical, more likely to fight existing beliefs and values and more likely to inspire progress, in whichever direction that might be. Whether we’re talking about Aristotle, Einstein or Hitler, they were all extremely intelligent and fit that description perfectly.

Keeping that in mind and adding the fact that religion used to be the dominant way of thinking in basically every society, it only makes sense that the intelligent people in society were the first to criticise it. Religion had developed flaws, and just like in every other time, the brighter minds decided that an alternative was needed to get rid of those flaws. That alternative was atheism.

But there are many more reasons why intelligent people were the first to embrace this alternative. For example, intelligent people are more likely to be interested in science. Things that go right over someone’s head if they are less intelligent are extremely appealing to the brighter minds in society, and since religion has, in common belief, turned into some kind of opposite of science, it only makes sense that those with higher intelligence might be more inclined to reject it. After all, science has taught us that the earth is billions of years old, so it seems likely that the Bible at least wasn’t right about everything.

Still, that doesn’t mean that there is no God. One of the main characteristics of mankind, intelligent or not, is that we have always been wrong about pretty much everything. Just take those extremely famous and brilliant people I mentioned above: all three of them turned out to be wrong about a lot of things, and in Aristotle’s case, even about almost everything he said. So even if many intelligent people believe that there is no God, we cannot ever be sure, because there is no reliable scientific evidence. Science is not an aristocracy where clever people get to vote about facts.

Ultimately, if we truly want to be open-minded, we have to look at these findings from every angle. We cannot just analyse it from one perspective and come to a rapid conclusion without considering other explanations. Of course, it makes sense that many atheists, especially those who have been disappointed by religion in their personal past, are prone to take any chance they get to disprove religion, but it doesn’t work that way. The fact of the matter is that no matter how badly you might want it, God just cannot be disproved at this point in time, especially not by the obvious discovery that atheists are more intelligent than theists.

~

Don’t forget to rate/share/like this post, and if you have any thoughts of your own, please do leave them in the comments! And if you’re new here? Feel free to like the Facebook page for regular updates, or try having a look at the list of most popular posts!

More on this topic from Dean Richards:

Atheists Are Just as Ignorant as Those They Find Ignorant

How Science Proves That We Actually Don’t Exist

Religious and Atheist Societies Are Destructive

Advertisements

About Dean Richards

A young student with a passion for writing. Aspiring author and human rights activist, but I write about anything. "If you don't like how things are, change it! You're not a tree!" New blog post every Monday!
This entry was posted in Controversial, Open-minded and tagged , , , , , , , , . Bookmark the permalink.

6 Responses to It Is Irrelevant That Atheists Are Smarter Than Religious People

  1. norm-ds says:

    Good one!

    My thought on this has always been — “OK, if IQ and intelligence is somehow equated to correctness of beliefs then let’s add up the IQ’s of every person who has ever lived and put them in 2 categories, theist or atheist. That will prove whether there’s a God or not.”

    🙂

    • Sounds valid to me! ^^

    • jb33sva says:

      Umm…unless you have a demonstratable method to show how that particular conclusion could be determined, i’m not sure how you could even make sense of that. What does taking all the IQ’s and tallying up the totals for atheists and theists show? The only way to prove God exists is to have repeatable demonstrative phenomena. Even if you think this is a valid way to prove existence of God, the research has shown that atheists are found to be more intelligent than theists.

  2. Craen says:

    I like this sentence: “One of the main characteristics of mankind, intelligent or not, is that we have always been wrong about pretty much everything.”. It is so true. In science we always say that every discovery must be undermined. Nothing is real. In the past, scientists believed that homosexuality is a disease, or that the width of the nose shows criminal tendencies (or something like that). It was so many ridiculous and harmful research, when we learn to carefully carry out reliable studies?

    • Science won’t ever be flawless I’m afraid. It will always be biased and prejudiced based on whatever that scientists believes him or herself, which is shown in your example: those people believed that certain races were inferior and that homosexuality was a disease, and thus they proved it scientifically.

      That’s an aspect of science that we will never be able to get rid of.

  3. paarsurrey says:

    Reblogged this on paarsurrey and commented:
    Paarsurrey says:
    Very good points.
    • “So even if many intelligent people believe that there is no God, we cannot ever be sure, because there is no reliable scientific evidence”
    Paarsurrey: I agree with this point. Being an intelligent human being does not mean that one is necessarily right also.
    • “After all, science has taught us that the earth is billions of years old, so it seems likely that the Bible at least wasn’t right about everything.”
    Paarsurrey: Very truly said; the teachings of Bible originally were truthful; with the passage of time the narrators of the scribes added things or took away things; or interpreted things wrongly.
    • “Religion had developed flaws, and just like in every other time, the brighter minds decided that an alternative was needed to get rid of those flaws.”
    Paarsurrey: It was not appropriate to find the alternative; instead they should have preferred to cut-off the dry branches yet saving the tree itself. There could be no alternative of the Word of Revelation.
    The flaws could be weeded out.
    • “Whether we’re talking about Aristotle, Einstein or Hitler, they were all extremely intelligent and fit that description perfectly.”
    Paarsurrey: The later scientific search found out the mistakes they have made; yet everybody respects them for the contribution they had made to the human knowledge.
    • “Some atheists have become precisely that which they have always fought against: closed-minded.”
    Paarsurrey: There are a lot many of close-minded Atheists; one can see them on the internet; arrogant and deriding all the time; yet they claim to be Humanists.
    • “The idea that this somehow justifies their claims and makes them in the right seems to be a popular way to interpret these results.”
    I Paarsurrey: agree with you.

Thoughts, criticism, questions or whatever else, they're always welcome! You can leave them down here, and none (as long as they're civil) will be deleted or denied.

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s