How The Gaza Conflict Shows That Independent Press Doesn’t Exist

For a few weeks now, I have been thinking about whether or not I should write about the Gaza conflict. I decided not to, and because of that, this post be about the media in general, with the conflict between Israel and Palestine merely serving as a good example. Before going into that, however, let me explain why I decided not to write about the conflict itself.

First of all, the reason I told myself was the real one is that everything that could possibly be said has already been said. Whereas the reporting on the conflict was completely one-sided not too long ago, recently more and more people (and occasionally even Western news websites) have begun to at least consider the Palestinian point of view. That doesn’t mean that we’ve reached a point of objectivity, but at least I wouldn’t be telling you anything new if I began to outline the issue from a Palestinian viewpoint, nor would I be convincing anyone new. As much as that is true, however, there is a second reason that probably plays a bigger role than I wanted to admit.

Thinking about the issue hurts. Physically. Ignorance is normal and like everyone, I have grown used to it, but there is a point where it just becomes too much, where the injustice leads to a point of complete hopelessness. When people are against homosexuality, at least my mind can be soothed by the idea that there are people out there who are supportive of those who struggle with their sexuality. I am able to convince myself that whatever bigotry and ignorance exists in this world, there are always people with different opinions to reach out to, and because of that, we can survive. But in the Gaza, that irrational hope, that wishful thinking, is impossible.

These people are the victims of a genocide and there is nobody in the world both willing and able to reach out to them. Every government is just watching, excusing it by saying that at least some terrorists are being killed as well, while these people suffer and die. And if that hopelessness can already hurt me, sitting here safely behind my computer in a Western country, can you even imagine what it does to them? Knowing that if they had a different religion, if the enemy had been any other country, we would all be shouting about war crimes now. But because it’s them, because they were born the way they were, the world doesn’t care. And all they can do is pray that as many people they know will survive. That it won’t be their children who will die.

Anyway… now that we’ve cleared up what I’m not going to tell you about, let’s move on to the topic at hand: media objectivity. In the West, we are so incredibly proud of how our media is free, how journalists can say whatever they want and how the news we receive is objective. We look down on other countries for not having that same objectivity, and judge them without further thought. What the Gaza conflict has shown us, though, is that that just isn’t true.

For years, Western media was fully in favour of Israel, regardless of what they did. Now, however, we see the perspective changing, bit by bit, towards Palestine. But why? Did anything change? Not really. The conflict is still the same, except now the victims are visible. The Palestinians have discovered the power of the camera and have managed to make us feel bad for them despite our fear and revulsion of Islam. We still use the same excuses and the same reasons, but at least now the media has caught on to the idea that these people are victims too, regardless of their religion.

What we forget, though, is that this has always been the case, except we didn’t report on it. We didn’t look at it from their point of view, yet we still thought that our media was objective, immune to the political influences of our government.

Now, we realise that we were wrong. In 10 years, we’ll realise that we were still wrong today, and in 20 years, we’ll realise that we were wrong in 2024.

How about we just admit that we’re wrong right now and get it over with?


Don’t forget to rate/share/like this post, and if you have any thoughts of your own, please do leave them in the comments! And if you’re new here? Feel free to like the Facebook page for regular updates, or try having a look at the list of most popular posts!

More on this topic from Dean Richards:

Is Islamophobia The New Anti-Semitism?

We Are All Ignorant: Social Media and the News

Things You Shouldn’t Think You Know About Islam


About Dean Richards

A young student with a passion for writing. Aspiring author and human rights activist, but I write about anything. "If you don't like how things are, change it! You're not a tree!" New blog post every Monday!
This entry was posted in Controversial, Opinion and tagged , , , , , , , , , . Bookmark the permalink.

6 Responses to How The Gaza Conflict Shows That Independent Press Doesn’t Exist

  1. David says:

    why the reference to homosexuality in this post? for crying out loud sakes, the comparison if there is any at all between genoside and homsexualty is pointless and some what deceptive.

    • I’m sorry, it was just meant as an example of something terrible that still has hope. For me personally, homophobia is such a thing. I could also have used pretty much any other form of discrimination, or other issues with similar effects.

      I would never want to compare homophobia with genocide, though, and that was definitely not how that particular paragraph was intended.

      • David says:

        I dont know if homophobia is the right word for what you are trying to discribe, I know of a conversation that was on a radio station,and a gentle man was explaining the real meaning for homophobia, and he was a homophobic the same way that someone would have a phobia about spiders or confined spaces, it was simply nothing to do with choice thats just the way he was.
        I have a brother who is not at all gay, but for a long time he was called queer or faggot, by the way I hate any of those labels. However he ended up with big psychological problem and is still the same now. I understand your frustration about the way war is always one sided. I know you have no time for a god. But I am sure that if there is not a higher moral standard we are in deep trouble.

        • I’m a little lost about your reasons to oppose my use of homophobia as an example: did you mean I should not have used it because you think homosexuality is wrong? Because if that’s the case, then that would definitely not be the right discussion here, as it is way beyond the point of this post. At first I actually assumed you were arguing in support of gay rights and thought my use of the comparison was homophobic.

          I also don’t really get the sentence “I know you have no time for a god.” That seems like you’re suggesting that someone who is in favour of gay rights cannot be religious or even believe in a God without a religion, which I’d say is a rather hasty conclusion to draw.

          • Anonymous says:

            There is no mention in my reply to you that I feel homosexuality is wrong, I did not say that, I may not agree with homosexuals about their opinions on some things but this is no different form me not agreeing with straight people about some of their opinions, just to be clear, I’m not a bigot, or homophobic.( what ever it is you mean by this) You really need to define homophobic just so there is no doubt as to what you mean by saying it.
            “Homosexuals” I agree that there are very uneducated opinions about gay people, what I totally disagree with is the comparison between the chastisement and killing of innocent people, you said it yourself genocide, and the gay community. There has never been historically a situation where gay people were rounded in the thousands or millions and slaughtered, yet some of them carry on like they have. Why?
            My assumption about you not having time for god was probably incorrect and I apologise.
            You would be hard pushed to find anyone who is of a doctrinal religious belief who would be in favour of gay rights, when it comes to marriage.
            I am in favour of gay rights, but there is no basis for calling me anything if it fits, if I disagree with some of their opinions and again its the same for straight people.
            I appreciate your comments.

Thoughts, criticism, questions or whatever else, they're always welcome! You can leave them down here, and none (as long as they're civil) will be deleted or denied.

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in: Logo

You are commenting using your account. Log Out /  Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )


Connecting to %s